Plausible vs Matomo

This is the classic "how much analytics do I actually need?" decision. Plausible is deliberately minimal; Matomo is the full, self-hostable GA replacement — heatmaps, session recording, A/B tests and all. One is a clean dashboard; the other is a platform.

The short version

Pick Plausible if you want a beautiful, one-screen answer to "how's my traffic?" with nothing to configure. Pick Matomo if you need a complete GA replacement — heatmaps, session recordings, funnels, A/B testing, form analytics — and you're willing to run it (self-host free) or pay for Cloud. Matomo is also the only option here that can import your Google Analytics history.

How they compare

 PlausibleMatomo
LicenseOpen source (AGPL)Open source (GPL)
PricingCloud from $9/mo · CE freeCloud from ~€19/mo · self-host free
Self-host
Cookieless✓ by default✓ (configurable)
Heatmaps / recording
A/B testing / funnelsFunnels on Business✓ (full)
GA history import
SimplicityVery simplePowerful, heavier

When Plausible wins

  • You want simplicity — a single, opinionated dashboard with no setup, plugins or tuning.
  • You want a fully hosted, sub-1KB script and don't want to run a database or worry about scaling.
  • Privacy-by-default matters — cookieless out of the box with no configuration to get there.

When Matomo wins

  • You need the full toolbox — heatmaps, session recording, A/B testing, funnels and form analytics.
  • You must keep GA history — Matomo can import it, so trends don't reset to zero.
  • You want everything on your own servers — a mature, self-hostable platform with a plugin marketplace.

Migration effort

Plausible → Matomo is a script swap, plus optional GA import if you want history. Expect more setup with Matomo: self-hosting means a PHP/MySQL stack to run and update, and some capabilities (heatmaps, A/B testing) are separate plugins or paid add-ons. If that's more platform than you want but you still need more than Plausible, Fathom or GA4 may be the better middle ground.